ArticleScientific reports2025
A preliminary assessment of a stool-based microRNA profile for early colorectal cancer screening.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- MicroRNAs and Other Small RNAs in Liquid Biopsies as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Fecal miR-146a as a Non-Invasive Biomarker forLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- MicroRNA Signatures of Prostate Cancer Spheroids in Microfluidic Culture Under Hormone-Deprivation Conditions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comprehensive Landscape of Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: From Genomics to Multi-Omics Integration in Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Microinflammation-Driven Gene Expression Dynamics in the Pathogenesis of Metabolic Disorders and Cancer.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening methods are well established worldwide as a fundamental pilar in CRC management, namely through non-invasive faecal occult blood testing. However, the limited sensitivity of faecal occult blood test for detecting precancerous lesions highlights the need to search for alternative tools, such as microRNAs (miRs). The main aim of this study was to identify stool-based miR profiles for early colorectal cancer detection. A panel with miR-21-5p, miR-199a-5p, and age showed a moderate performance for colorectal cancer detection (sensitivity: 88%). Additionally, miR-451a, miR-21-5p, miR-199a-5p, age, and gender showed high performance for discriminating high-grade dysplasia lesions (sensitivity: 91%). Moreover, when we obtained a positive result in either panel, we achieved a sensitivity of 96% for high-grade dysplasia lesions identification. Finally, when a negative result was obtained in these panels after a positive faecal occult blood test result, we accurately identified individuals without lesions. These findings demonstrate the potential of miR panels as non-invasive biomarkers for colorectal cancer and high-grade dysplasia lesions detection and could constitute a secondary screening method following a positive faecal occult blood test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.