ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2026
Treatment choice and sexual health outcomes in gay and bisexual men with prostate cancer.
Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Urological Content Accuracy as an Unmeasured Dimension in Generative AI Chatbot Communication About Sexual Health After Prostate Cancer.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Sexual function outcomes following prostate cancer treatment in sexual and gender minority populations: a mixed-methods systematic review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Dosimetric Predictors of Problematic Receptive Anal Intercourse After Prostate Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe differential impacts of radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) on sexual health in gay and bisexual men (GBM) with prostate cancer remain understudied, limiting recommendations incorporating preferred sexual behavior.
methodsSecondary analysis of Restore-2 compared outcomes in GBM after RP (n = 127) or EBRT (n = 27).
resultsCompared to RP, EBRT was associated with lower rates of climacturia (11% vs. 59%, p < 0.001), condom-related erectile dysfunction (27% vs. 51%, p = 0.047), and decreased penile length/girth (49% vs. 69%, p = 0.07), but higher rates of anodyspareunia (33% vs. 14%, p = 0.06).
conclusionsExploratory findings suggest EBRT for insertive intercourse, RP for receptive intercourse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.