Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764770›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025

Sex, Attraction, and Social Norms: Distinguishing Romantic and Non-Romantic Relationships in Non-Sexual Contexts.

Ana Carolina de Barros, Emily R L Lackie, Sari M van Anders

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ana Carolina de BarrosDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2557-230X
Emily R L LackieDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-5845-7498
Sari M van AndersDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. sva5@queensu.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5343-2059

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Close relationships are typically distinguished by whether they are "romantic" versus "platonic" and this distinction is often based on sexual attraction and/or behavior. However, several forms of close relationships do not follow this pattern. Thus, the purpose of this research was to explore how individuals distinguish between romantic relationships and close, non-romantic relationships in non-sexual contexts. We aimed to answer the following research questions: (1) What differentiates romantic and non-romantic close relationships? (2) How do people distinguish between people they want to be in non-romantic versus romantic relationships with? and (3) Do underlying structures of romantic and non-romantic relationships differ and, if so, how? We recruited 30 individuals who were either in romantic non-sexual relationships or close non-sexual relationships that they considered to be "more than a typical 'best friend' relationship." Participants completed 60-min interviews where we asked them about several aspects of their relationship (e.g., labels, development, and structure), as well as their understandings of romantic and non-romantic relationships in general. We analyzed data using template analysis and developed several themes, including: differentiators between romantic and non-romantic relationships (intimacy, type of love, interdependence, social norms, and sexuality), similarities between romantic and non-romantic relationships (importance, emotions, and behaviors), romantic attraction (interest, excitement, enaction, and intellectual connection), and similarities and differences in relational structures (commitment, effort, terms and labels, development, and conflict). Our results contribute to the growing literature on diverse relationships and specify how norms about sexuality play a role in distinguishing relationship types, even for asexual individuals.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsLoveSexual BehaviorSexual PartnersSocial NormsAdolescentAdultFemaleFriendsHumansMaleYoung AdultAromanticAsexualFriendshipNon-sexual relationshipsRomantic relationships

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.