ArticleScientific reports2025
Left to dry: unseen risks lurking on reusable medical devices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical waste and greenhouse gas emissions in cataract surgery: a multicenter interventional study at ten Japanese hospitals.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Addressing Challenges Associated With Loaner Instrument Sets.AORN journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, the intricate relationship between the complexity of reusable medical devices and their cleaning efficacy is explored to the point of cleaning failure. The results identified complex device features that require manual cleaning regardless of soil drying time, as well as device designs (i.e., features) that are appropriate for a fully automated cleaning process. All features were evaluated for cleaning performance under conditions where the soil was not allowed to dry, as well as replacing manual cleaning steps with non-manual methods, (i.e., substituting manual brushing and flushing with soaking and sonication). Findings revealed that soil drying on reusable medical devices can increase the cleaning challenge specific to the device feature. Devices engineered with visually accessible challenging geometries, as opposed to those with enclosed or concealed features, successfully met the requirements for soil drying times and semi-automated cleaning evaluations. However, device features with occluded geometries such as ball bearings, leaf springs, threaded screws, and mated surfaces proved more challenging to clean effectively. Since device features vary in their cleaning complexity, each device should be assessed based on their features. By recognizing the risks associated with soil drying on reusable devices, healthcare facilities can implement appropriate practices that streamline more effective cleaning processes that will inform patient safety along with paving the way for future automation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.