Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764717›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Development and interpretation of a machine learning risk prediction model for post-stroke depression in a Chinese population.

Xia Zhong, Tianen Zhao, Shimeng Lv, Guangheng Zhang, Jing Li, Donghai Liu, Huachen Jiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xia ZhongInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Tianen ZhaoJinan Lixia Dezhengtang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250000, People's Republic of China.
Shimeng LvInstitute of First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Guangheng ZhangInstitute of First Clinical Medical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, 250011, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Jing LiInstitute of Child and Adolescent Health, School of Public Health, Peking University, No.38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China. jing.li@hsc.pku.edu.cn.
Donghai LiuCollege of Laboratory Animal Science, Shandong First Medical University, No.6699, Qingdao Road, Huaiyin District, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, People's Republic of China. jinanatp@163.com.
Huachen JiaoInstitute of Cardiology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lixia District, Room 101, Unit 3, Building 1, No. 125, Huanshan Road, Jinan, 250014, Shandong, People's Republic of China. liyixuan0531@163.com.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation GZB20240036National Natural Science Foundation of China (General Program) 82474422Peking University Medical Youth Science and Technology Innovation Yangfan Programme BMU2025YFJHPY006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current evidence for predictive models of post-stroke depression (PSD) risk based on machine learning (ML) remains limited. The aim of this study is to develop a superior predictive model based on ML algorithms for PSD in the Chinese population. We retrospectively gathered data from 507 patients who were hospitalized for ischemic stroke between June 2022 and August 2023 at a medical facility in China. The patients were separated into a training group (70%) and a validation group (30%). After selecting the core predictors of PSD using LASSO regression dimension reduction, six machine learning (ML) algorithms were used to statistically model the risk prediction of PSD. Based on five-fold cross-validation, we evaluated the predictive performance of the developed model. Shape Additive Explanation (SHAP) analysis was then used to interpret the best-performing model. PSD developed in 158 (31.16%) of the 507 eligible patients. Frontal lobe lesion, number of lesions, ALB, NIHSS, PSQI, and MMSE were considered significant predictors of PSD. The AUC(0.941), accuracy (0.876), sensitivity (0.822), specificity (0.899) , F1 score (0.802), and average precision (AP) value (0.858) of XGBoost model were superior to other ML models. The XGBoost model offers an interpretable PSD prediction tool using key clinical indicators, though external validation is needed to confirm generalizability.

Indexed as

DepressionMachine LearningStrokeAgedAlgorithmsChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsIschemic strokeMachine learningPost-stroke depressionPrediction modelRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40764717
PMCPMC12325716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.