ArticleCommunications chemistry2025
3D conformation and crystal interaction insights into drug development challenges for HCV drug analogues via molecular simulations.
Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ABT-333 and ABT-072 are two potent non-nucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitors designed for the treatment of the hepatitis C virus (HCV). These structural analogs differ only by a minor substituent change, which disrupts the planarity of the naphthyl group on the ABT-333 compound through the addition of a more flexible trans-olefin substituent. However, this minor change leads to significant differences in their conformational preferences and intermolecular interactions, resulting in a ripple effect with drug development implications, ranging from crystal polymorphism and low aqueous solubility to formulation development challenges. In this article, we demonstrate how a suite of molecular simulation approaches, including crystal structure prediction augmented with a new hydrate CSP algorithm, free-energy perturbation, molecular dynamics (MD) based solubility predictions, and topological assessment to evaluate surface re-crystallization tendencies, provide key atomistic-level insights into the differentiated performance of the two analogs. Through this study, we establish the importance of end-to-end physics-based modeling, which involves explicit considerations of 3-D structure and crystal packing interactions. This approach provides structural and energetic insights into the physicochemical properties and drug development challenges faced when designing best-in-class drug molecules.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.