ArticleScientific reports2025
TCN-QRNN model for short term energy consumption forecasting with increased accuracy and optimized computational efficiency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probabilistic deep learning framework for dynamic carbon emission accounting of electric buses under grid uncertainty.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of the growing volume and complexity of data, traditional methods of energy consumption forecasting, such as Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), face computational complexity issues that limit their real-time application. This also complicates the effective management of energy systems. In this work, a new model is proposed that combines the advantages of Temporal Convolutional Networks (TCN) and Quasi-Recurrent Neural Networks (QRNN) for energy consumption forecasting. TCN allows for effective processing of long time series, capturing essential temporal dependencies. Meanwhile, QRNN reduces computational costs through parallelization of operations and an optimized architecture. The effectiveness of the proposed model has been assessed in comparison with traditional methods such as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) networks, as well as other convolutional approaches. Experimental results show that the proposed TCN-QRNN model outperforms traditional methods by 40% in accuracy compared to LSTM and by 8% in terms of metrics such as Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) compared to TCN-LSTM, while reducing data processing time by 30%. Additionally, the model has a significantly smaller number of parameters than LSTM and GRU, making it suitable for environments with limited computational resources. The proposed model ensures a high level of energy consumption forecasting accuracy while significantly reducing processing time, making it promising for use in real-world energy systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.