ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling the impact of intercellular signaling on dose metrics and therapeutic outcomes in spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) for lung cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Bibliometric analysis of global research trends in spatially fractionated radiotherapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Roadmap for the implementation of particle minibeam therapy.Medical physics · 2026Review
- The future is not always uniform: rethinking radiotherapy through spatial fractionation.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- From Semantic Modeling to Precision Radiotherapy: An AI Framework Linking Radiobiology, Oncology, and Public Health Integration.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Phantom-Based Dosimetric Comparison of Helical and Fixed-Beam TomoTherapy for Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy Using GRID and Lattice Target Designs.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) delivers heterogeneous dose distributions to enhance tumor control while reducing normal tissue toxicity. Since conventional models like the linear-quadratic (LQ) model overlook intercellular signaling, a key factor in non-uniform fields, this study uses an advanced mathematical model to assess its impact on SFRT plan evaluation. A volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based SFRT framework was developed, resulting in two treatment plans: VMAT-GRID and 3D lattice radiation therapy (3D-LRT). A kinetic model incorporating both direct radiation damage and intercellular signaling was implemented to simulate signal dynamics, DNA damage, and calculate the survival ratio across 3D voxelized volumes. Key dosimetric and biological indices, including mean dose, equivalent uniform dose (EUD), valley-to-peak dose ratio (VPDR), therapeutic ratio (TR), and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), were computed using both physical and biological doses. Incorporating intercellular signaling led to increased EUD, mean dose, VPDR, and NTCP, particularly in 3D-LRT plans with steeper dose gradients. Additionally, signaling effects caused extra biological damage in non-irradiated cells within low-dose regions, which resulted in a decreased TR. This study highlights that accounting for radiation-induced signaling alters the evaluation of SFRT plans compared to models considering only direct radiation effects. Therefore, to achieve accurate assessment, particularly in complex techniques like 3D-LRT, it is advisable to employ models capable of capturing both direct and indirect radiation responses. Additionally, experimental validation is a crucial step toward translating this model into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.