ArticleScientific reports2025
High-Resolution prediction of soil pH in European temperate forests using Sentinel-2 and ancillary environmental data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil pH is a key indicator for understanding soil health status in forested ecosystems, yet high-resolution mapping of this variable, especially at a 30-m spatial resolution, remains limited. This study uses Sentinel-2 spectral data, in-situ soil pH measurements, topsoil physical properties from the Land Use/Cover Area Frame Survey (LUCAS) database, and elevation data to estimate soil pH across temperate forests in Europe using a Random Forest model. Despite challenges in signal penetration due to forest canopy cover, the model achieved high prediction accuracy (R² = 0.62) at 30 m resolution. Bulk density, available water capacity, and clay content were the most influential physical predictors, while Sentinel-2 bands, particularly SWIR (1.610 and 2.190 μm), NIR (0.842 μm), and red-edge (0.705 and 0.783 μm), captured key vegetation responses related to soil acidity. Spatial analysis showed higher model accuracy in central and southern Europe, with reduced performance in Scandinavia, likely due to more acidic soils and extreme seasonal variation. The model also revealed significant pH differences among forest types, with deciduous forests showing the highest values and coniferous the lowest. These findings demonstrate the potential of high-resolution remote sensing data for monitoring soil pH, supporting forest management, biodiversity conservation, and climate adaptation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.