ArticleScientific reports2025
Transfer learning driven fake news detection and classification using large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A hybrid deep learning approach integrating CNN and transformer for lung cancer classification using CT scans.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Towards improved fake news detection using a hybrid RoBERTa and metadata enhanced XGBoost model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Today, the problem of using social media to spread false information is not only widespread but also quite serious. The extensive dissemination of fake news, regardless of whether it is produced by human beings or computer programs, has a negative impact not only on society but also on individuals in terms of politics and society. Currently of social networks, the quick dissemination of news provides a challenge when it comes to establishing the reliability of the information in a satisfactory manner. Because of this, the requirement for automated technologies that can identify fake news has become of the utmost importance. Existing fake news detection methods often suffer from challenges such as limited labeled data, inability to fully capture complex linguistic nuances, and inadequate integration of different embedding techniques, which restrict their effectiveness and generalizability. In this work, we propose a novel multi-stage transfer learning framework that leverages the strengths of pre-trained large language models, particularly RoBERTa, tailored specifically for fake news detection in limited data scenarios. Unlike prior studies which primarily rely on standard fine-tuning, our approach introduces a systematic comparison of word embedding techniques such as Word2Vec and one-hot encoding, combined with a refined fine-tuning process to enhance model performance and interpretability. The experimental results on two real-world benchmark datasets demonstrate that our method achieves a significant accuracy improvement of at least 3.9% over existing state-of-the-art models, while also providing insights into the role of embedding techniques in fake news classification. To address these limitations, our approach fills the gap by combining multi-stage transfer learning with embedding comparisons and task-specific optimizations, enabling more robust and accurate detection on small datasets. Based on the findings of our experiments conducted on two datasets derived from the real world, we have determined that the transfer learning-based strategy that we have developed can outperform the most advanced approaches by a minimum of 3.9% in terms of accuracy and offering a rational explanation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.