ReviewTranslational neurodegeneration2025
Role of extracellular vesicle-carried ncRNAs in the interactive 'dialogue' within the brain and beyond: emerging theranostic epigenetic modifiers in brain-derived nanoplatforms.
Review in Translational neurodegeneration, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Astrocyte-Derived Extracellular Vesicles and the Evolution of Neural Complexity: Perspectives on Vesicle-Mediated Neuron-Glia Communication.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Penumbra-derived small extracellular vesicles carry pathogenic RNA driving remote damage after cortical infarction.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Neurogenic heterotopic ossification: from molecular mechanisms to clinical treatment.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Neuropathic Pain: Mapping the miRNA Landscape.Non-coding RNA · 2026Review
- Extracellular RNAs as Messengers and Early Biomarkers in Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper brain function and overall health critically rely on the bidirectional communications among cells in the central nervous system and between the brain and other organs. These interactions are widely acknowledged to be facilitated by various bioactive molecules present in the extracellular space and biological fluids. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are an important source of the human neurosecretome and have emerged as a novel mechanism for intercellular communication. They act as mediators, transferring active biomolecules between cells. The fine-tuning of intracellular trafficking processes is crucial for generating EVs, which can significantly vary in composition and content, ultimately influencing their fate and function. Increasing interest in the role of EVs in the nervous system homeostasis has spurred greater efforts to gain a deeper understanding of their biology. This review aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of brain-derived small EVs based on their epigenetic cargo, highlighting the importance of EV-encapsulated non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) in the intercellular communication in the brain. We comprehensively summarize experimentally confirmed ncRNAs within small EVs derived from neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes across various neuropathological conditions. Finally, through in-silico analysis, we present potential targets (mRNAs and miRNAs), hub genes, and cellular pathways for these ncRNAs, representing their probable effects after delivery to recipient cells. In summary, we provide a detailed and integrated view of the epigenetic landscape of brain-derived small EVs, emphasizing the importance of ncRNAs in brain intercellular communication and pathology, while also offering prognostic insights for future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.