ArticleBMC health services research2025
Sustainability starts with spending: public financial management lessons from Kenya's universal health care pilot.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Financial barriers and inequalities in healthcare access across East Africa: evidence from demographic and health surveys.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEffective public financial management (PFM) is a foundational enabler of sustainable progress toward Universal Health Coverage (UHC). Achieving UHC requires not only increased funding for the health sector but also the efficient, equitable, and accountable use of resources. In 2019, Kenya piloted a UHC initiative across four counties to generate evidence to inform national scale-up. This study examines the PFM processes underpinning the pilot implementation, with a focus on how financial planning, budget execution, and accountability mechanisms influenced the delivery of UHC interventions at the county level.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative research design to explore PFM processes during the implementation of Kenya's UHC pilot in four counties. Data were collected through 51 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with key stakeholders, including healthcare workers, patient representatives, and senior members of the County Health Management Teams (CHMTs). An inductive thematic analysis approach was employed to identify patterns and themes that emerged from the data. The analysis was facilitated using Dedoose software (Version 9.0.17), which enabled systematic coding and organization of the qualitative data.
resultsThe UHC pilot program in Kenya featured a hybrid planning model, combining top-down directives from the national government with bottom-up inputs from county stakeholders. Despite this collaborative approach, county budgeting processes remained governed by the stipulations of the PFM Act. While counties welcomed additional UHC funds, the removal of user fees led to reduced facility-level revenue, increased service demand, and strain on human and material resources. Delays in fund disbursement, rigid budget structures, and limited financial autonomy further constrained implementation. These experiences underscore the need for a more coherent integration of PFM and health financing policies at the subnational level to ensure sustainable and equitable health service delivery.
conclusionThe UHC pilot offers critical lessons for future health financing reforms. Addressing PFM bottlenecks-particularly those related to timely disbursement, budget flexibility, and local revenue generation-is essential to ensure the sustainability of UHC in Kenya and similar contexts. The study's limitations necessitate further research before scaling up nationwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.