Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764554›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2025

Validation and evaluation of the application of the ICF Rehabilitation Set: a Polish clinical perspective.

Agnieszka Wiśniowska-Szurlej, Agnieszka Sozańska, Justyna Brożonowicz, Anna Wilmowska-Pietruszyńska, Bernard Sozański

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06718036 (Validation and Evaluation of the ICF Rehabilitation Set), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06718036 enrolling by invitationnot on this map

Validation and Evaluation of the ICF Rehabilitation Set: a Polish Clinical Perspective

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of RzeszowRan2024 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsChronic DiseaseArmsValidation and evaluation of the use of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in clinical practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Physical Therapist Evaluations in the United States: Results of a Feasibility Study.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Agnieszka Wiśniowska-SzurlejFaculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, 35-310, Poland. agwisniowska@ur.edu.pl.
Agnieszka SozańskaFaculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, 35-310, Poland.
Justyna BrożonowiczFaculty of Health Sciences and Psychology, Collegium Medicum, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, 35-310, Poland.
Anna Wilmowska-PietruszyńskaFaculty of Medicine, Lazarski University, Warsaw, 02-662, Poland.
Bernard SozańskiFaculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, 35-310, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring a patient's functional status in the rehabilitation process is essential for the ongoing improvement of the quality of the rehabilitation services offered. This possibility is provided by the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the ICF Core Sets developed on its basis. The purpose of this study was to validate and evaluate the use of the ICF Rehabilitation Set in rehabilitation patients in clinical practice in southeastern Poland.

methodsThis study included patients who required comprehensive rehabilitation in a tertiary care rehabilitation centre. The study used the Polish version of a rating reference guide for the ICF Rehabilitation Set and the Barthel Index. The assessment was carried out by an interdisciplinary team, which established the ICF qualifier values by consensus. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients between the Disability Index (DI) and the Barthel Index (BI). To assess the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the study group, a paired Wilcoxon test was used to compare the measurements of the two ICF codes.

resultsThis study demonstrated the consistency and reliability of the reference guide for the ICF Rehabilitation Set. The ICC values were very high (for B620; D450; D640, the ICC was 1.000) and high (for E155, the ICC was 0.793). The individual entries from the ICF Rehabilitation Set were found to have very high concordance for assessing individual qualifiers between researchers (the ICC for the DI was 0.995). The ICF Rehabilitation Set scores and the calculated DI were correlated with the BI scores. The ICF Rehabilitation Set is sensitive to changes in the functional status of patients undergoing rehabilitation and is consistent with the results obtained by the BI measure. There was also a statistically significant improvement in patients' functional status after rehabilitation.

conclusionsThe ICF Rehabilitation Set and the developed rating reference guide are reproducible, consistent and relevant and can be used in clinical settings to collect health information from people undergoing rehabilitation. Further research is needed to strengthen the evidence to validate the ICF in Poland.

trial registrationThe study was registered in the clinical trial registry at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06718036, date of registration 2024-11-30, retrospectively registered).

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthPersons with DisabilitiesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolandRehabilitation CentersReproducibility of ResultsClinical toolDisability and HealthICF Rehabilitation SetInternational Classification of FunctioningInterrater reliabilityRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40764554
PMCPMC12326788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.