ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Toward a fair, gender-debiased classifier for the diagnosis of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder- a Machine-Learning based classification study.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Reproducible Post-Valve-Replacement EHR Cohort for Comparative AI Studies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Applicability of Existing Gender Scores for German Clinical Research Data: Scoping Review and Data Mapping.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAttention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is the most common neurodevelopmental disorder. Gender disparities in the diagnosis of ADHD have been reported, suggesting that females tend to be diagnosed later in life than males are. The delayed diagnosis in females has been attributed to an inequality in the diagnostic criteria, failing to focus on the gender differences regarding symptomatology, comorbidity, and societal factors contributing to this disparity.
methodsIn this study, we introduced debiased classifiers for the diagnosis of ADHD via different bias mitigation algorithms of the AI Fairness 360 toolbox on a training dataset of 400 children and adolescents with and without ADHD (98 females, 25 ADHD patients, 73 typically developing females), a subsample of the Child Mind Institute dataset. Test data were acquired in an earlier study. Two datasets were used, one including personal characteristic features, scores of the clinical questionnaire Child Behavior Checklist, and wavelet variance coefficients as quantifiers of neural dynamics (fMRI), a second dataset included personal characteristic features, scores of the clinical questionnaire Child Behavior Checklist, and radiomic features of neural structure (sMRI).
resultsWe found that the reweighed XGBoost model achieved the best accuracy and highest fairness in both datasets. Using model explanation, we showed how reweighing influenced feature importance at the global and local levels.
conclusionBased on methodological characteristics and insights from global and local model explana-tion, we discuss the reasons of these findings and conclude, that using the combination of bias mitigation and model explanation, improved classification models can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.