ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Enhancing pediatric distal radius fracture detection: optimizing YOLOv8 with advanced AI and machine learning techniques.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico augmentation strategies for enhanced machine learning performance in fracture recognition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bibliometric Analysis of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Radiology and Medical Imaging: A Focus on Deep Learning Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn emergency departments, residents and physicians interpret X-rays to identify fractures, with distal radius fractures being the most common in children. Skilled radiologists typically ensure accurate readings in well-resourced hospitals, but rural areas often lack this expertise, leading to lower diagnostic accuracy and potential delays in treatment. Machine learning systems offer promising solutions by detecting subtle features that non-experts might miss. Recent advancements, including YOLOv8 and its attention-mechanism models, YOLOv8-AM, have shown potential in automated fracture detection. This study aims to refine the YOLOv8-AM model to improve the detection of distal radius fractures in pediatric patients by integrating targeted improvements and new attention mechanisms.
methodsWe enhanced the YOLOv8-AM model to improve pediatric wrist fracture detection, maintaining the YOLOv8 backbone while integrating attention mechanisms such as the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) and the Global Context (GC) block. We optimized the model through hyperparameter tuning, implementing data cleaning, augmentation, and normalization techniques using the GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset. This process addressed class imbalances and significantly improved model performance, with mean Average Precision (mAP) increasing from 63.6 to 66.32%. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The iYOLOv8 models demonstrated substantial improvements in performance metrics. The iYOLOv8 + GC model achieved the highest precision at 97.2%, with an F1-score of 67% and an mAP50 of 69.5%, requiring only 3.62 h of training time. In comparison, the iYOLOv8 + ECA model reached 96.7% precision, significantly reducing training time from 8.54 to 2.16 h. The various iYOLOv8-AM models achieved an average accuracy of 96.42% in fracture detection, although performance for detecting bone anomalies and soft tissues was lower due to dataset constraints. The improvements highlight the model's effectiveness in pathological detection of the pediatric distal radius, suggesting that integrating these AI models into clinical practice could significantly enhance diagnostic efficiency.
conclusionOur improved YOLOv8-AM model, incorporating the GC attention mechanism, demonstrated superior speed and accuracy in pediatric distal radius fracture detection while reducing training time. Future research should explore additional features to further enhance detection capabilities in other musculoskeletal areas, as this model has the potential to adapt to various fracture types with appropriate training. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.