ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Dynamic and interpretable deep learning model for predicting respiratory failure following cardiac surgery.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Innovations in Transfusion Medicine: A Narrative Synthesis of Current Reviews.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Correction: Dynamic and interpretable deep learning model for predicting respiratory failure following cardiac surgery.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative respiratory failure following cardiac surgery (CS-PRF) remains a critical complication with substantial morbidity and mortality. Current risk prediction models are limited by static assessments and suboptimal accuracy. This study aimed to develop and validate a dynamic, machine learning–based model to enhance perioperative risk stratification for CS-PRF.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1,016 adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery. Feature selection was conducted via the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and Boruta algorithms. Five machine learning models, including logistic regression, multilayer perceptron, extreme gradient boosting, categorical boosting, and deep neural network (DNN), were trained using preoperative and intraoperative variables. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision–recall curve (AUPRC), and calibration metrics. Model interpretability was evaluated via SHapley additive exPlanation (SHAP), and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were used to explore nonlinear associations.
resultsThe incidence of CS-PRF was 16.3%. In the validation cohort, the DNN model achieved superior performance, with an AUROC of 0.782 (95% CI 0.703–0.852) and an AUPRC of 0.496 based on preoperative variables, which improved to an AUROC of 0.855 (95% CI 0.796–0.906) and an AUPRC of 0.549 with the addition of intraoperative data. Calibration analysis demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed risk. SHAP analysis of the preoperative model identified pulmonary artery pressure, age, and preoperative creatinine as key contributors. In the combined model, intraoperative features such as cardiopulmonary bypass duration and autologous blood transfusion volume emerged as additional important predictors. RCS analysis revealed a nonlinear association between age and CS-PRF. A web-based risk calculator integrating DNN predictions and individualized SHAP interpretation was deployed to support clinical decision-making.
conclusionsWe developed a deep learning model that integrates perioperative variables to predict postoperative respiratory failure following cardiac surgery. Demonstrating high accuracy and interpretability, the model has been deployed as an accessible web-based calculator, offering a practical tool for personalized perioperative risk assessment.
trial registrationNot applicable. This study is a retrospective observational study and was not registered as a clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.