SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025
The global prevalence of biofilm-forming Enterococcus faecalis in clinical isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Iron, Biofilm, and Colorectal Cancer: Mechanistic Insights Into Enterococcus faecalis Pathogenesis.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026Review
- DTT-based biofilm and conventional intraoperative cultures for the detection of prosthetic joint infections: a comparative study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Antibacterial Efficacy of Local Therapeutic Agents Against Specific Gram-Positive Bacteria Associated with Pericoronitis.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Sub-Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations of Amoxicillin Modulate Biofilm Formation and the Expression of Biofilm-Associated Genes inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sessile growth on human dentine is associated withJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Whole-genome characterization of clinical Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates reveals mecA-positive E. faecalis and a shared lnu(A)-rep7a resistance plasmid in Türkiye.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Growth-dependent tRNA Reprogramming and Codon Bias Link Translation to Metabolic State inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multiple virulence attenuating strategies against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Natural, synthetic, and synergistic approaches.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Cloxiquine exerts bactericidal activity against Enterococcus faecalis through disruption of proton motive force and induction of reactive oxygen species.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity, antimicrobial resistance, and biofilm-associated virulence in clinical Enterococcus faecalis isolates from Hamedan, Iran.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Biofilm Formation, Virulence Traits, and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles ofInternational journal of microbiology · 2026Article
- The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance of bacterial strains from large-scale healthy chicken flocks in the Észak-Alföld region of Hungary.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) is a major cause of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). It exhibits a strong biofilm-forming ability, which contributes to treatment resistance and persistence. Despite its clinical relevance, the global prevalence of biofilm-forming E. faecalis remains poorly defined. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of biofilm-forming E. faecalis in clinical isolates worldwide.
methodsFollowing PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and institutional repositories for studies published between 2015 and 2024. A total of 56 studies involving 3,739 clinical isolates met the inclusion criteria. We used a random-effects model to estimate pooled prevalence and conducted subgroup analyses based on WHO region, continent, publication year, specimen type, and biofilm detection method. Meta-regression and sensitivity analyses assessed heterogeneity and robustness. Publication bias was evaluated using Egger's test and corrected with trim-and-fill analysis.
resultsThe global pooled prevalence of biofilm-forming E. faecalis was 68.68% (95% CI: 61.33-76.02%), with significant heterogeneity (I² = 99.30%). By WHO region, prevalence ranged from 57.93% (95% CI: 41.01-71.85%) in South-East Asia to 73.66% (95% CI: 63.40-83.92%) in the Eastern Mediterranean. By continent, South America (all from Brazil) showed the highest prevalence at 89.79% (95% CI: 73.02-106.56%). Studies from 2021 to 2024 reported higher prevalence (76.18%, 95% CI: 66.25-86.11%) than those from 2015 to 2020. Among specimens, urine showed the highest prevalence (80.47%, 95% CI: 61.17-99.77%). Among biofilm-positive isolates, 47.92% (95% CI: 39.34-56.51%) were strong producers. Meta-regression identified WHO region (p = 0.005) and specimen type (p = 0.043) as significant sources of heterogeneity. Egger's test indicated publication bias (p = 0.0066), but trim-and-fill analysis yielded a consistent adjusted prevalence of 68.08%.
conclusionBiofilm formation is highly prevalent in E. faecalis clinical isolates globally, with substantial regional and specimen-based variation. These findings highlight the urgent need for standardized biofilm detection protocols, improved infection prevention and control, tailored antibiotic stewardship, and the development of anti-biofilm therapies to mitigate biofilm-associated resistance and enhance patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.