ArticleScientific reports2025
Reduced risk of lymphedema after immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Obese Patients Undergoing Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on lymphedema incidence in women diagnosed with breast cancer. We included 45,734 women aged ≥ 30 years treated for breast cancer (ICD-10 primary diagnostic code C50) since 2017. Propensity score-matched analysis compared patients who underwent immediate reconstruction (n = 5,256; stratified into implant and autologous groups), with those who did not (n = 5,256). Multivariate-adjusted extended Cox regression was used to assess lymphedema outcomes. Lymphedema incidences were similar between the immediate reconstruction (22.50%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.60-25.30%) and no reconstruction groups (25.30%; 95% CI: 22.50-28.00%; P = 0.180). After adjusting for age, surgery type, treatments, and comorbidities, immediate reconstruction showed an inverse association with lymphedema (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85). When stratified by reconstruction method, implant reconstruction exhibited a reduced risk (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.82), while autologous reconstruction showed a higher risk (adjusted HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.39-2.78) for lymphedema. Immediate implant-based reconstruction may lower lymphedema risk, but interpretation requires caution due to potential selection bias, missing data on BMI, breast size, and applicability beyond East Asian populations. Further research with detailed patient information is needed to confirm clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.