Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764499›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Progression and regression of keratoconus in an Iranian population.

Alireza Jamali, Hassan Hashemi, Payam Nabovati, Mehdi Khabazkhoob

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza JamaliRehabilitation Research Center, Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hassan HashemiNoor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
Payam NabovatiRehabilitation Research Center, Department of Optometry, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. nabovatipayam@yahoo.com.
Mehdi KhabazkhoobDepartment of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate temporal changes in keratoconus (KCN) in individuals of different ages. In this historical cohort study, participants diagnosed with KCN underwent two evaluations at separate time points. Each evaluation included corneal imaging using Pentacam-HR, ocular examinations, subjective refraction, and visual acuity assessments. KCN changes were defined as a minimum 1.00 D change in the anterior maximum keratometry (kmax), categorizing participants as regressive, stable, or progressive. A total of 838 participants (mean age 30.90 ± 8.30 years; 62.5% male) were assessed twice over an average follow-up period of 74.38 ± 42.21 months. Regression occurred in 81 eyes (mean Kmax change: -2.05 ± 1.27 D), progression in 196 eyes (mean Kmax change: +4.03 ± 4.58 D), and stability in 561 eyes (mean Kmax change: +0.07 ± 0.43 D); Cases of both progression and regression were observed across all 10-year age groups. At baseline, the regressive group had the highest corneal steepening, while the stable group had the least steepening (p < 0.05). The spherical equivalent was more negative in all three groups in the second examination except for those with ages more than 50 years (p < 0.05). Associations were observed between Kmax changes and male sex (β=-0.58; p = 0.013), posterior flat keratometry (β = 0.75; p < 0.001), posterior peripheral curvature (β=-1.91; p < 0.001), index of surface variance (β = 0.03; p < 0.001), keratoconus index (β = 4.04; p = 0.012), and minimum curvature (β = 1.05; p = 0.003). This study highlights that KCN can progress or regress at any age, challenging the traditional belief that it stabilizes in adulthood. The findings highlight the necessity of regular monitoring and individualized management strategies, particularly in cases where structural or visual changes may impact clinical decisions.

Indexed as

KeratoconusAdolescentAdultCorneaCorneal TopographyDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedRefraction, OcularVisual AcuityYoung AdultAgeCorneaKeratoconusProgressionRegression

Identifiers

PMID40764499
PMCPMC12325675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.