ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025
Exploring gendered experiences of Parkinson's disease patients and their carers: implications for decision-making in Deep Brain Stimulation.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The decision to undergo Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is influenced by expectations, concerns, and gendered experiences. This study explores how patients and carers navigate the DBS decision-making process, focusing on gender-specific motivations, fears, and caregiving dynamics. In-depth interviews were conducted with 12 patients (5 females, 7 males) and 11 carers (6 females, 5 males) to explore their lived experiences with PD and DBS decision-making. A hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis was applied to identify key patterns. PD gradually disrupts daily life-men primarily struggle with work and independence, while women experience emotional and social withdrawal. Female carers report greater emotional strain and sacrifices, whereas male carers focus on their partners' independence. DBS is viewed as a last resort, offering hope for (1) symptom relief, (2) psychological freedom, and (3) social reintegration. Women fear symptom worsening and surgical vulnerability, while men worry about treatment efficacy and surgery duration. Female carers prioritize patient independence, while male carers view DBS as vital for family stability. Our study highlights gendered differences in how PD impacts daily life and caregiving, with women experiencing more emotional and social challenges. Motivations for DBS were similar across genders, but men and women expressed distinct concerns, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive treatment approaches. This study advocates for integrating gender-sensitive approaches in clinical care to enhance support, improve decision-making, and facilitate postoperative adaptation to DBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40764445What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.