ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel cuproptosis-related genes nomogram on the prognosis and immune microenvironment of breast invasive carcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explore the relationship between breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) and cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs). CRGs related to prognosis were calculated using Lasso analysis and multivariate Cox analysis based on BRCA data from the TCGA, CRG signatures were then generated to categorize patients based on their risk scores into high-risk and low-risk categories. The GEO dataset was used as external validation. A nomogram was constructed in order to further predict the survival of patients. We also examined differences in the infiltrative status of immune cell subsets present between the high-risk and low-risk categories. The prognostic gene expression were validated utilizing real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). We identified nine CRGs associated with survival and built a risk model to separate patients into high - and low-risk groups with distinct differences in survival time. Risk model performance was confirmed by the ROC curve and nomogram. Additionally, we found a significant difference between the two patient groups in the extent of immune cell infiltration. qRT-PCR analysis revealed differential expression of seven CRGs (AK7, CEL, GRIA3, KCNE2, NT5C1A, PGK1, NOS1) across various breast cancer cell lines compared to MCF-10 A cells, showing both positive and negative regulation in different cell lines. These results may help illuminate the functions that CRGs perform in BRCA, which might improve our knowledge of cuproptosis and facilitate the implementation of more successful immunotherapy techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.