ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
Associations between cardiovascular health metrics in life's essential 8 and incident hypertension: The LIFE Study.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence, Awareness, and Treatment of Hypertension in 37 African Countries: Trends From 2003 to 2022.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 is a set of modifiable lifestyle habits and risk factors used to assess cardiovascular health (CVH). However, little is known about the potential impact of non-ideal statuses in these metrics on hypertension risk. This study aimed to clarify the associations between the total number of non-ideal CVH metrics and incident hypertension in a Japanese population. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from 10 Japanese municipalities participating in the LIFE Study. We identified National Health Insurance enrollees who had undergone health checkups between April 2017 and March 2018. Participants were categorized into 7 groups (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-7 metrics) based on their total number of non-ideal CVH metrics (excluding blood pressure). The hazard ratio of each group (reference: 0 metrics) for new-onset hypertension was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. During a mean follow-up period of 1405 days, 22 826 (24.5%) participants developed hypertension. Hypertension risk significantly increased with higher numbers of non-ideal CVH metrics (hazard ratios ranged from 1.067 for 1 metric to 1.609 for 6-7 metrics). Additionally, all non-ideal CVH metrics except for blood lipids were found to be significant predictors of hypertension. Higher numbers of non-ideal CVH metrics in Life's Essential 8 were consistently associated with a higher incidence of hypertension. Multicomponent lifestyle modification strategies that improve overall CVH status may help to prevent hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40764399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.