ArticleScientific reports2025
Association between sex and the developmental morphokinetics of in vitro derived bovine embryos.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Developmental Morphokinetics and the Transcriptomic Profile of Bovine First-Cleaved Embryos: Normal vs. Abnormal Divisions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fertilization with sex-sorted semen is the most used approach to increase the proportion of female calves in dairy farms; however, it is commonly characterized by a lower pregnancy rate. We provide new insights into embryo developmental morphokinetics following fertilization with sorted semen. We also examined whether morphokinetic parameters are sex specific and can be used to select embryos with a desired sex. The first experiment included in vitro fertilization with X- and Y-sorted or unsorted semen. Embryos were developed in a time-lapse system and their developmental morphokinetics was recorded; blastocysts were collected for DNA-PCR and their sex was determined by TSPY and BOV97M expression. In the second experiment, fertilization was performed with unsorted semen and the embryo sex was predicted by the differential kinetic parameters that were found in the first experiment. The proportion of embryos that developed to blastocysts was higher in the unsorted vs. the sex-sorted group; embryos in this group also had diverse morphokinetics. Moreover, male and female embryos displayed different developmental kinetics. The prediction rate for male embryos was relatively low (~ 59-67%), indicating a limited accuracy of sex predication based on the kinetic data. A larger-scale study with a higher number of embryos might clarify this point.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.