Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764376›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The complex role of knowledge diversity in firm's collaborative innovation under inclusive culture.

Manyu Xiong, Dengke Yu, Huan Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manyu XiongSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Dengke YuSchool of Public Policy and Administration, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Huan XiaoPostdoctoral Mobile Station for Management Science and Engineering, Nanchang University, No. 999, Xuefu Avenue, Honggutan New District, Nanchang, 330031, Jiangxi, China. xiaohuan@ncu.edu.cn.

Funding

Jiangxi Provincial Key Research Base Projects in Philosophy and Social Sciences 24ZXSKJD12Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation 20242BAB20011National Natural Science Foundation of China 72362028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaboration innovation (CI) is increasingly becoming a crucial strategy for enterprises to enhance their technological capabilities. The knowledge base among members and collaborative environment significantly impact on the success of collaboration. However, existing research has overlooked exploration of inter-firm's knowledge diversity and inclusive culture. This study was developed information/decision-making theory and social categorization theory to investigate how knowledge diversity and inclusive culture affect firms' CI. This study collected 5126 annual observations from 712 listed companies in China's high-tech manufacturing industry between 2016 and 2023. Regression analysis through Stata 17.0 was used to test the conceptual model. By employing the fixed effects model, we found that: (1) knowledge variety (KV) positively impacts CI, while knowledge separation (KS) exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with CI; (2) KV positively influences collaborative innovation depth (CD) but does not significantly affect collaborative innovation breadth (CB), while KS exhibits an inverted U-shaped relationship with CD; (3) Inclusive culture primarily manifests in relation to KS, which positively moderates the effect of KS on CD. This exploration of when and how the KS promotes or inhibits CI broadens the understanding of the consequences of KS in an inter-firm perspective.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorKnowledgeOrganizational CultureOrganizational InnovationChinaHumansCollaboration innovationCollaborative innovation breadthCollaborative innovation depthInclusive cultureKnowledge diversity

Identifiers

PMID40764376
PMCPMC12325723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.