ArticleScientific reports2025
The practical impact of indoor temperature on the productivity of prefabricated construction workers using electroencephalogram data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehending the optimal indoor temperature to augment the productivity and cognitive well-being of prefabricated construction workers (PCWs) is essential for enhancing efficiency and safety in construction. Twenty-four workers participated in experiments conducted at indoor temperatures of 24℃, 27℃, 30℃, and 33℃. During the experiments, workers underwent neurobehavioral tests at different indoor temperatures, and thermal sensation and comfort questionnaires were administered post-test to evaluate thermal comfort. Productivity was measured by the accuracy and reaction time in the neurobehavioral tests. Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings during the tests provided data on attention, mental workload, vigilance, and mental fatigue. The results demonstrate that indoor temperature directly affects workers' productivity and indirectly impacts it through cognitive states and thermal comfort. Analyzing correlations of cognitive state indicators and their changes over time, 27℃ and 30℃ are more conducive to enhancing PCWs' productivity. Furthermore, it was observed that workers' productivity is higher in longer tasks at the same indoor temperature compared to shorter tasks. These results offer practical guidelines for optimizing indoor temperature to better PCWs' working conditions. By identifying productivity-enhancing temperature ranges, the study provides actionable insights to boost worker efficiency, reduce cognitive strain, and sustain performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.