ArticleNature communications2025
Perinatal outcomes of symptomatic chikungunya, dengue and Zika infection during pregnancy in Brazil: a registry-based cohort study.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chikungunya virus: global epidemiology, transmission dynamics, and emerging challenges for public health.Infection · 2026Review
- Temporal trends and maternal factors associated with congenital anomalies among live births in São Paulo, Brazil: a population-based study, 2015-2023.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Expert Recommendations to Strengthen Chikungunya Outbreak Surveillance and Reporting for Traveler Health Protection.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2026Article
- In-utero exposure to chikungunya and child morbimortality: a population-based study using linked routine data.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of placental transmission mechanisms for Dengue and Zika viruses: outcomes and future directions.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Innate immune sensing of alphavirus chikungunya: balancing antiviral defense and pathogenesis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Maternal-Fetal Implications of Chikungunya Virus Infection: An Updated Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Maternal Dengue Infection and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The previous literature shows mixed conclusions regarding the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with symptomatic chikungunya, dengue, and Zika. We investigated this topic using a linked population-based Brazilian cohort from 2015 to 2020. The study included 6,993,395 live births. Among these, 6066 ( < 0.1%) mothers were notified with chikungunya during pregnancy, 19,022 (0.3%) with dengue, and 8396 (0.1%) with Zika. Symptomatic maternal chikungunya was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (Hazard ratio: 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.22), low Apgar score 5' (1.44, 1.14-1.82), and neonatal death (1.50, 1.15-1.96). Symptomatic maternal dengue was associated with preterm birth (1.07, 1.02-1.12), low birth weight (1.10, 1.04-1.15), congenital anomalies (1.19, 1.03-1.37), and low Apgar score 5' (1.26, 1.09-1.45). Symptomatic maternal Zika was associated with all adverse birth outcomes, particularly congenital anomalies, which were over twice the risk (2.36; 1.91-2.67) compared to the unexposed group. This study provides evidence of the adverse consequences of arbovirus infections during pregnancy, including critical time windows by trimester. Our findings emphasise the importance of implementing effective measures to prevent chikungunya, dengue, and Zika infections during pregnancy and the associated adverse birth and neonatal outcomes, which may have long-term health consequences for mothers and their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.