Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764276›Full record

ArticleAustralian veterinary journal2025

Systemic antibiotic use in fire-affected koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the 2019-2020 wildfires.

F K McDougall, O Funnell, J M McLelland, C Flanagan, M Govendir, F Stoeckeler, I Smith, M L Power

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Australian veterinary journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

F K McDougallSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-9702
O FunnellZoos South Australia, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4703-9377
J M McLellandZoos South Australia, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
C FlanaganPort Macquarie Koala Hospital, Koala Conservation Australia, Port Macquarie, New South Wales, 2444, Australia.
M GovendirSydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3595-0500
F StoeckelerKangaroo Island Veterinary Clinic, Kingscote, South Australia, 5223, Australia.
I SmithZoos South Australia, Frome Rd, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-2917
M L PowerSchool of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, 2109, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-4301

Funding

Morris Animal Foundation D21ZO-507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat for people and animals, including wildlife. The overuse and misuse of antimicrobials continues to fuel the spread of AMR. We performed a retrospective analysis of systemic antibiotic administration in fire-affected koalas admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the catastrophic Australian wildfires in 2019-2020, to assess the practice of antimicrobial stewardship during a wildlife emergency. Triage and treatment records were obtained for fire-affected koalas (n = 355) admitted to two facilities during the wildfires. Analyses showed that 40.3% of koalas at Facility A and 35.0% of koalas at Facility B received systemic antibiotics. The majority of antibiotics (63.9%, comprising multiple types of beta-lactams) administered to koalas at Facility A were prophylactic treatments in koalas with noninfected moderate to severe cutaneous burn wounds. The majority of antibiotics (75.0%, comprising chloramphenicol and enrofloxacin) administered to koalas at Facility B were chlamydial disease treatments. Overall, 29.4% of all antibiotic treatments (predominantly beta-lactams and enrofloxacin) were administered for recorded clinical infections. Where koala-specific guidelines and protocols for treating burn wounds were not available, there was an overuse of systemic antibiotics and frequently sub-optimal antibiotic stewardship in burnt koalas during the 2019-2020 wildfire emergency response. Best practice antibiotic prescribing was also not always feasible due to a shortage of first-choice antibiotics (e.g., injectable chloramphenicol for chlamydial disease). This study highlights the importance of preparedness for future wildfire events and identifies a need for equipping veterinarians with guidelines for treating fire-affected koalas during emergency situations. Additional education, guidance and resources are required to enable appropriate antimicrobial stewardship by responding veterinarians during wildlife emergencies.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPhascolarctidaeWildfiresAnimalsAnimals, WildAntimicrobial StewardshipAustraliaMaleRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipburnsbushfireschlamydia infections

Identifiers

PMID40764276
PMCPMC12331400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.