ReviewPsyCh journal2025
Artificial Intelligence Reshapes Creativity: A Multidimensional Evaluation.
Review in PsyCh journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07693803 (The Effect of Artificial Intelligence Integration Timing on Group Brainstorming and Ideation in Undergraduate Students), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Effect of Artificial Intelligence Integration Timing on Group Brainstorming and Ideation in Undergraduate Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Navigating the Paradox of Creativity: Pathways to Fostering Talent and Innovation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Psychological and social factors influencing AI painting tool adoption among young-old adults in the context of creative aging.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Source matters, AI anxiety less so: comparing employee reactions to human, AI, and hybrid performance feedback and the limited role of AI anxiety.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Reshapes Creativity: A Multidimensional Evaluation.PsyCh journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping creativity by challenging its long-held status as a uniquely human faculty. This study uses bibliometric analysis to reveal AI's evolution from a passive instrument to an active co-creator that amplifies human intuition and expands creative possibilities. We highlight how AI-driven evaluative frameworks offer more objective, scalable, and inclusive assessments of creativity, disrupting bias-prone traditional methods. Also, this transformation raises pressing ethical and legal concerns, particularly regarding authorship, intellectual property, and recognition of machine-generated outputs. By mapping these tensions and opportunities, the study provides a critical foundation for rethinking creativity in the age of human-machine collaboration. Our findings point toward an urgent need for new conceptual models that align innovation with ethical and societal responsibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.