ArticleBMJ open2025
Risk factors associated with experiences of violence and its consequences for women's health: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionViolence against girls and women (VAWG) is a public health problem and a violation of human rights. The prevalence of different forms of VAWG indicates that this is a recurring global issue that provokes economic, social and health consequences. In this paper, we outline a scoping review protocol to characterise risk factors for VAWG from an intersectional and intergenerational perspective and discuss the consequences of such experiences for women's health. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol will be conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Methodology for Scoping Reviews and will involve six consecutive steps: (1) formulating the research question, (2) search strategy, (3) study selection, (4) eligibility criteria, (5) data extraction, (6) data analysis and presentation of results and (7) stakeholder consultation. The search strategy will include eight indexed databases (PubMed, BVS, Scopus, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cinahl, Cochrane Library and PsycInfo) and recommendations from professional organisations and international agencies. The search will be limited to publications in English, Spanish and Portuguese, according to the Health Sciences Descriptors/Medical Subject Headings and free terms. Two independent researchers will select articles based on the inclusion criteria, and a third author will be consulted to establish consensus. Data extraction will involve a form with information on study characteristics, methodological issues and main results from the sources of evidence. Extracted data will be analysed using descriptive and content analysis. The NVIVO 14 software will be used to organise and validate the data. The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/P6H2S). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as data from publicly available literature sources will be used. The results will be disseminated through publications in scientific journals and presentations of the evidence to stakeholders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.