ArticleBMJ open2025
Overcoming fear of cancer recurrence in young adult survivors: a resource-based approach centred on healthcare professionals - a protocol for systematic reviews and thematic synthesis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most prevalent psychological concerns among young adult cancer survivors. Despite its clinical relevance, little is known about how survivors overcome this fear and the role of healthcare professionals in that process. This protocol outlines a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis to explore the coping mechanisms and support resources that facilitate overcoming FCR in young adult cancer survivors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Social Sciences Citation Index) and supplemented by hand-searching. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data synthesis will follow Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach, guided by the post-traumatic growth theory. The review aims to identify key support systems and professional interventions that aid in coping with FCR, emphasising the unique developmental and psychosocial context of young adulthood. The final synthesis will inform targeted, resource-based interventions by healthcare providers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this study is a retrospective review involving secondary analysis of publicly available primary data, ethical approval is not required. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scholarly conferences and other relevant professional forums. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251029414.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.