Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40764037›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted infections2025

Association of self-reported HIV infection with oral pre-exposure prophylaxis use among women of reproductive age in Lesotho: evidence from mixed-effects estimates of nationally representative data.

Michael Ekholuenetale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael EkholuenetaleDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria mic42006@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2372-3020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined the association of self-reported HIV status with history of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use among reproductive-age women from Lesotho.

methodsThis study analysed a sample of 6413 women from the 2023-24 Lesotho Demographic and Health Survey (LDHS) data. The data were collected between November 2023 and February 2024. Categorical data were analysed with percentages and χ

resultsThe weighted prevalence of self-reported HIV infection among women was 22.1% (95% CI 20.6% to 23.7%). Among women who ever used oral PrEP, the prevalence of self-reported HIV infection was 13.4% (95% CI 9.9% to 17.9%), but was 24.0% (22.0% to 26.1%) among women who have never used. History of oral PrEP use was associated with 62.0% reduction in the odds of self-reported HIV infection (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.38; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.51). Respondents who have heard of a sexually transmitted infection (STI) have 27.0% reduction in the odds of self-reported HIV infection when compared with those who have not heard of an STI (aOR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90). Women aged 25+ years at first sex had 60.0% reduction in the odds of self-reported HIV infection, when compared with those <18 years at first sex (aOR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.84). Women with multiple total lifetime number of sexual partners had higher odds of self-reported HIV infection, when compared with those with single lifetime number of sexual partner.

conclusionsHIV infection among women in Lesotho remains high. Having a history of oral PrEP use was associated with lower odds of self-reported HIV infection. Stakeholders in healthcare should promote oral PrEP interventions and design programmes for HIV prevention among women.

Indexed as

HIV infectionsHIV seropositivityHIV seroprevalencewomen

Identifiers

PMID40764037
PMCPMC13151520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.