ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025
Usability Testing of an Internet-Based Responsive Parenting Program for Caregivers of Young Survivors of Childhood Cancer Living in Rural and Appalachian Communities: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06769334 (Digital Health Intervention to Improve Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Young Childhood Cancer Survivors in Underserved Communities), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Digital Health Intervention to Improve Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Young Childhood Cancer Survivors in Underserved Communities
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Usability and Feasibility of a School-Based Digital Framework for Bullying Prevention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Young survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed and treated before the age of 7 years are at heightened risk of developmental difficulties. As a result, their caregivers may experience stress as they navigate various educational and health care systems while advocating for their child's needs. To our knowledge, there are no tailored early interventions or support programs to address the unique and multifaceted needs of young survivors of childhood cancer and their caregivers. Digital platforms can provide anticipatory guidance and developmental resources, which may be especially impactful for families at increased risk for health and educational disparities, particularly in underserved rural and Appalachian areas. Objective: This mixed methods study describes the usability testing of an internet-based responsive parenting program for caregivers of young survivors of childhood cancer, called the Preparing for Life and Academics for Young Survivors (PLAY) program. Methods: Twelve caregivers of young survivors of childhood cancer (9 biological parents, 2 grandfathers, and 1 legal guardian; 33% rural, 33% Appalachian, and 83% White) participated in an online usability session with a task-based, think-aloud method. This session was followed by completion of the System Usability Scale (SUS), responses to reaction cards to describe their experiences with the platform, and a semistructured interview. Two trained coders used rapid analysis and consensus methods to identify themes. Results: Overall, caregivers found the platform easy to use (92% SUS >68; mean 82.2, SD 14.45). Most caregivers provided positive feedback in response to reaction cards (eg, useful, appealing, and valuable) to describe the platform. Qualitative findings highlighted that most caregivers perceived the platform as "easy to use," and several participants described it as a helpful educational tool. Participants noted that potential platform improvements should include accessibility features (eg, closed captioning for videos), more tailored content, and usability on mobile devices. Conclusions: With further improvements, digital platforms such as PLAY may be a promising avenue to bridge access to care for high-need groups and ultimately improve child neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.