ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Story Retelling and Verbal Working Memory in Young Adults With a History of COVID-19: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has primarily been studied in the context of language delays or developmental disorders in infants and children. However, the effects on young adults have received less attention. COVID-19 not only affects physical health but also cognitive and language functions, which is an emerging area of research. While previous studies have focused on developmental stages, the effects of COVID-19 on the language abilities of healthy young adults remain underexplored. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the spoken language, particularly in story retelling and working memory, in young adults. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effects of COVID-19 on memory-based story retelling and verbal working memory in young adults. Specifically, it examined whether there were group differences in story retelling and working memory performance between individuals with and those without a history of COVID-19, and whether verbal working memory predicted story retelling outcomes. Methods: The study involved 79 young adult participants, of whom 39 were in the non-COVID-19 group and 40 were in the COVID-19 group. Participants completed the Story Retelling Procedure (SRP) and a verbal working memory task. Story retelling performance was quantified using information units per minute (IUs/min), a measure of informativeness in story retelling. Working memory was assessed using the Alphabet Span Test. Results: Participants with COVID-19 produced fewer information units per minute (mean 0.53, SD 0.21) than those without COVID-19 (mean 0.63, SD 0.24; P=.049). No significant group differences were found in verbal working memory performance (P=.20). However, regression analysis showed that verbal working memory significantly predicted story retelling performance (R²=.064, P=.02), suggesting that individual differences in working memory capacity may contribute to discourse informativeness, regardless of COVID-19 history. Conclusions: Young adults with a history of COVID-19 exhibited reduced story retelling performance compared to those without a history of infection. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in verbal working memory performance between groups. Furthermore, verbal working memory scores significantly predicted story retelling performance, suggesting a functional link between these cognitive-linguistic domains. These findings suggest that story retelling performance may serve as a sensitive indicator of post-COVID-19 cognitive-linguistic changes in young adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.