ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Predicting patient deterioration with physiological data using AI: systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Technical Approaches to Predicting Acute Deterioration in Pediatric Inpatients: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe second iteration of the National Early Warning Score has been adopted widely within the UK and internationally. It uses routinely collected physiological measurements to standardise the assessment and response to acute illness. Its use is associated with reduced mortality but has limited positive and negative predictive accuracy. There is a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting clinical deterioration, but there is limited evidence to show which aspect of AI is best suited to this task. This systematic review aims to establish which AI or machine learning algorithm is best suited to analysing physiological data sets to predict patient deterioration in a hospital setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study) frameworks. Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library) will be used to search for studies published from 2007 to the present that meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will screen the studies identified and extract data independently, with any discrepancies resolved by discussion. The review is expected to be completed by January 2026, and the results will be presented in publication by June 2026. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as data will be obtained from published sources. Findings from this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.