ArticleBehavioural processes2025
Almost there: Learning to navigate approximately with a grid map.
Article in Behavioural processes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Grid map navigation, in which animals use intersecting environmental gradients to judge the spatial relationship between their location and their goal, has been proposed to account for impressive navigational abilities across various taxa. However, the precise mechanisms by which animals navigate using environmental gradients are obscure: first, how do animals extrapolate the spatial distribution of gradients, and second, how do they combine spatial information from multiple gradients? Various models of the extrapolation and combination of spatial gradients have been proposed, but the ontogeny of these mechanisms is little considered. Animals might be predisposed to utilise particular navigational strategies, with these fixed through development; alternatively, mechanisms might arise and change through learning. To investigate this, we trained artificial neural networks, as simple computational learning models, to navigate in virtual bicoordinate grid environments, and tested their outputs against previously proposed models. We found neural networks initially adopted 'the approximate model': determining their displacement in each gradient independently and summing these to approximate goalward directions. This supports the suggestion that this model represents a relatively simple mechanism to adopt in complex environments. However, by the end of training, neural networks no longer conformed to the model predictions, hence adopting this mechanism for a limited period only. Thus, the predictions of these models might be met only in certain developmental stages as animals learn. Conversely, the neural networks extrapolated gradients differently depending on the environment. These results facilitate more nuanced predictions of how animal navigation might develop through learning. These predictions should be tested as large tracking datasets of animal movements accumulate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.