ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Are caiman nests microhabitats? Assessing their ecological role across different levels of anthropogenic disturbance.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Are caiman nests microhabitats? Assessing their ecological role across different levels of anthropogenic disturbance.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wild vertebrates face increasing threats from human activities, particularly land-use changes, which disrupt ecological interactions and ecosystem structure. Animal-built structures, such as nests, can provide resources for diverse species, especially under conditions of environmental stress. Here, we evaluate whether broad-snouted caiman nests function as microhabitats for other vertebrates across varying levels of anthropogenic disturbance in Santa Fe, Argentina. Over four nesting seasons we monitored 64 nests in forests, savannahs and floating vegetation using camera traps, examining vertebrate species richness, interactions and visitation frequency. A total of 100 species were recorded, including 74 birds, 23 mammals and 3 reptiles. Amphibians and some reptiles could not be identified, as most photographs were nocturnal or because of their small size. Species richness was highest in the driest nesting season and in forest nests, but unrelated to anthropization. Of the species observed, 62% interacted with the nests through commensalism, predation or indirectly. The Interaction Strength Index (ISI) proved to be a reliable indicator of use of caiman nests. Caiman nests are structurally and ecologically relevant elements, as they provide resources for a wide variety of species. Including such structures in conservation strategies could contribute to more comprehensive approaches that go beyond a species-level focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.