ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025
Disappearing Text as a Clinical Decision Support Layer: A Case Series.
Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case series aims to evaluate several applications of inline disappearing text (DT) clinical decision support (CDS) tools within clinician documentation.DT blocks were created to prompt documentation for perioperative anticoagulation planning (scenario 1), predischarge intravenous antibiotic planning (scenario 2), and advanced care planning (ACP; scenario 3). In scenario 1, DT was the only intervention. In scenario 2, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList. In scenario 3, DT was paired with a documentation SmartList and an OurPractice advisory. The number of documented perioperative anticoagulation plans, predischarge intravenous antibiotic plans, and ACP notes was measured pre- and postintervention and compared using chi-square analyses.In scenario 1, there was no statistically significant change in the percentage of perioperative anticoagulation plans documented at 0 to 24 and 24 to 48 hours before surgery. In scenario 2, documentation of antibiotic contingency planning in patients expected to be discharged within 24 hours increased from 60% (54/90 notes) to 93% (1,850/1,994 notes)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.