ReviewProgress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England)2025
Enhancing peripheral nerve regeneration with rehabilitation and biomaterial-driven drug delivery strategies.
Review in Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is a common problem worldwide. PNI can lead to loss of sensory and motor functions, chronic neuropathic pain, and mental health issues, significantly impacting the patients' quality of life. Recent studies revealed that, beyond the topical injury site at peripheral nerves, PNIs can also induce dysfunctions in the central nervous system by causing maladaptive plasticity, which will result in exaggeration and exacerbation of the pathological condition caused by the primary injuries. The typical therapy strategies for traumatic PNI treatment are using sutures, nerve autografts, or conduits in cases requiring surgical intervention as well as applying physical-based rehabilitation to facilitate functional recovery. However, the functional restoration is generally unsatisfactory due to insufficient regeneration and long-lasting maladaptive neuroplasticity in the nervous system. In this review, we summarized various neurotrophic factors and neuroprotective agents that have been extensively studied as adjuvant therapies to enhance recovery efficiency after PNIs in the last two decades. Particularly, with the rapid development of biomaterials and bioengineering, controllable drug delivery techniques have shown great potential to maintain the drug bioactivity and, consequently, prolonging the therapeutic effects. Additionally, we explored the virus-based gene delivery technique, which has been used to transduce neural cells for enhancing nerve regeneration. Finally, we discussed current challenges, including inadequate motor function restoration, poorly defined rehabilitation protocols, unresolved chronic inflammation, and limited understanding of macrophage dynamics. We also offered perspectives on integrating various approaches to develop effective and comprehensive treatment strategies for PNIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.