ArticlePLoS pathogens2025
HBV capsid assembly modulators differentially modulate the assembly of wild-type and drug-resistant core protein chimeric nucleocapsids and empty capsids.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple capsid assembly modulators (CAMs) are in clinical development for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. The emergence of CAM-resistant HBV has resulted in the failure of CAM antiviral therapy in recent clinical trials. Because wild-type (WT) and CAM-resistant core protein (Cp) can co-assemble to form chimeric capsids, it is important to understand how CAMs modulate the assembly and disassembly of chimeric capsids and how CAM-resistant HBV variants emerge under CAM antiviral therapy. In addressing these questions, we found that in human hepatoma cells co-transfected with a serial molar ratio of WT and mutant HBV replicons expressing CAM-resistant Cp, expression of as few as 10% WT Cp conferred inhibition of nucleocapsid assembly by CAMs. However, 50% Cp with T33N substitution conferred complete resistance to the assembly of chimeric empty capsids induced by AB-506 but remained sensitive to GLS4, as determined in an in vitro capsid assembly assay and in transfected hepatoma cells. Moreover, the existence of approximately 50% WT Cp in chimeric nucleocapsids is required for CAMs to induce the disassembly of mature nucleocapsids and inhibit the infection of hepatocytes by HBV virions with chimeric nucleocapsids. Our results thus suggest that although disruption of nucleocapsid assembly requires only small numbers of CAM binding pockets at Cp dimer-dimer interfaces to be engaged, induction of mature nucleocapsid disassembly requires much larger numbers of CAM binding pockets to be occupied. The strong WT Cp dominance in CAM suppression of nucleocapsid assembly may slow down the emergence of CAM-resistant HBV variants under CAM therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.