Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40763298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Establishing a learning agenda for learning health system implementation and research in Canada.

Carly Whitmore, Marissa Bird, Shelley Vanderhout

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carly WhitmoreSchool of Nursing - McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3974-4854
Marissa BirdLearning Health Hub, Mississauga, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2188-0767
Shelley VanderhoutLearning Health Hub, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health systems in Canada struggle to generate and use knowledge to improve equity-centred quadruple aim measures, resulting in care that is misaligned with local contexts. Learning Health Systems (LHS) offer a solution by aligning real-time evidence, informatics, patient-provider partnerships, and institutional strategies to support continuous improvements in care. Despite their potential, LHS initiatives in Canada remain siloed and lack harmonized leadership, knowledge exchange, and capacity building. To address these gaps, the Learning Health Hub was established to foster collaboration, disseminate best practices, and enhance collective capacity for LHS in Canada. In June 2024, the Learning Health Hub hosted its inaugural virtual symposium. This event brought together partners, researchers, health professionals, system operators, and policymakers from across Canada interested in LHS work. The symposium aimed to map assets and build momentum for larger-scale impact in LHS. Participants engaged in generative activities to define challenges and co-create solutions, resulting in the identification of key learning priorities. Three learning themes were identified: Patient, Caregiver, and Community Partnership; Enabling Environments; and Benchmarking and Evaluation. By advancing these themes, the Learning Health Hub aims to drive meaningful, sustainable change and improve healthcare quality and outcomes.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareLearning Health SystemCanadaCapacity BuildingHumans

Identifiers

PMID40763298
PMCPMC12324668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.