Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40763288›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Open educational resources for distributed hands-on teaching in molecular biology.

Ariel Cerda, Alejandro Aravena, Valentina Zapata, Anibal Arce, Wladimir Araya, Domingo Gallardo, Javiera Aviles, Francisco Quero, Isaac Nuñez, Tamara Matute and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Ariel CerdaANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.
Alejandro AravenaANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.
Valentina ZapataInstitute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Medicine and Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Anibal ArceANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.
Wladimir ArayaIOWlabs, Santiago, Chile.
Domingo GallardoIOWlabs, Santiago, Chile.
Javiera AvilesANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.
Francisco QueroChemical Engineering and Biotechnology Department, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
Isaac NuñezANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4439-3745
Tamara MatuteANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.
Felipe NavarroANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0651-1210
Valentina FerrandoANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.
Marta BlancoDepartamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 340, Santiago, Chile.
Sebastian VelozoDepartamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Avenida Libertador Bernardo O'Higgins 340, Santiago, Chile.
Sebastian RodriguezLaboratorio de Biofabricación UC, Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sebastian AguileraLaboratorio de Biofabricación UC, Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Francisco ChateauLaboratorio de Biofabricación UC, Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y Estudios Urbanos, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Ruby Olivares-DonosoFacultad de Educación, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Jennifer C MolloyDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-8462
Guy AidelbergUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U1284, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity, Paris, France.
Ariel B LindnerUniversité Paris Cité, INSERM U1284, Center for Research and Interdisciplinarity, Paris, France.
Fernando CastroLaboratorio de Tecnologías Abiertas, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina.
Pablo CremadesÁrea de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Padre Contreras, Parque General San Martín, Mendoza, Argentina.
Cesar Ramirez-SarmientoANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-903X
Fernan FedericiANID - Millennium Science Initiative Program - Millennium Institute for Integrative Biology (iBio), Santiago, Chile.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9200-5383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The urgent need to develop a more equitable bioeconomy has positioned biotechnology capacity building at the forefront of international priorities. However, in many educational institutions, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, this remains a major challenge due to limited access to reagents, equipment, and technical documentation. In this work, we describe Open Educational Resources (OER) composed of locally produced biological reagents, open source hardware and free software to teach fundamental techniques in biotechnology such as LAMP DNA amplification, RT-PCR RNA detection, enzyme kinetics and fluorescence imaging. The use of locally produced reagents and devices reduces costs by up to one order of magnitude. During the pandemic lockdowns, these tools were distributed nationwide to students' homes as a lab-in-a-box for remote teaching of molecular biology. To test their performance, a total of 93 undergraduate students tested these resources during a biochemistry practical course. 27 out of 31 groups (~87%) successfully achieved the objectives of the PCR activity, while 28 out of 31 groups (~90%) correctly identified the target using LAMP reactions. To assess the potential application in secondary school, we organized three workshops for high school teachers from different institutions across Chile and performed an anonymous questionnaire, obtaining a strong agreement on how these OER broaden teachers' perspectives on the techniques and facilitate the teaching of molecular biology topics. This effort was made possible through a close collaboration with open source technology advocates and members of DIYbio communities, whose work is paving the way for low-cost training in biology. All the protocols and design files are available under open source licenses.

Indexed as

Education, DistanceMolecular BiologyChileHumansStudentsTeaching

Identifiers

PMID40763288
PMCPMC12324123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.