Trial reportBlood advances2025
Modification of belantamab mafodotin dosing to balance efficacy and tolerability in the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials.
Trial report in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
DREAMM 7: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (B-Vd) Compared With the Combination of Daratumumab, Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (D-Vd) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
A Phase III, Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (B-Pd) Versus Pomalidomide Plus Bortezomib and Dexamethasone (PVd) in Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (DREAMM 8)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Practical Guidance on Clinical Management of Belantamab Mafodotin-Associated Ocular Events.American journal of hematology · 2025Guideline
- Exposure-response analyses for belantamab mafodotin in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from DREAMM-6 Arm B and DREAMM-7.British journal of cancer · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin with Bortezomib plus Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: The DREAMM-6 Arm B Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- Belantamab mafodotin, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with RRMM in the phase 3 DREAMM-8 trial.International journal of hematology · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Belantamab Mafodotin with Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: A Comprehensive Exposure-Response Analysis of the DREAMM-8 Study.Targeted oncology · 2025Trial
- Belantamab mafodotin plus venetoclax in t(11;14)-positive relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma - the BELI(E)VE trial.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Simulation Framework to Investigate Efficacy and Ocular Safety of Belantamab Mafodotin Combinations in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates Reshape the Landscape of Cancer Therapy: Evolution, Challenges and Future Perspectives from the Concept of "Magic Bullet" to Clinical Application.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Mechanism of uptake and toxicity of a BCMA antibody drug conjugate with a MMAF payload by nonantigen expressing cells.Cell biology and toxicology · 2026Article
- Belamaf: is renal toxicity an overlooked side effect?Blood advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractBelantamab mafodotin (belamaf) combined with standard therapies demonstrated significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival benefits in DREAMM-7 and PFS benefit in DREAMM-8 in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Belamaf dose modifications managed adverse events, including belamaf-related ocular events. Ocular events included ocular adverse reactions (eg, dry eyes, photophobia, eye irritation) and protocol-mandated ophthalmic examination findings. Protocol-recommended dose modifications for ocular events were driven by ophthalmic examination findings and included belamaf dose delays until resolution and reductions. We used descriptive analyses to evaluate the impact of dose modifications on managing ocular events and treatment efficacy. In patients with normal baseline vision who were receiving treatment, dose modifications extended belamaf dosing intervals to a median of 8 to 12 weeks by 9 months; the prevalences of reduced vision to bilateral 20/50 or worse and ocular adverse reactions were highest in the first 3 months and remained low at later time points. The median time to resolution after grade ≥2 ophthalmic examination findings was 12 weeks. Rates of belamaf discontinuations due to ocular events were low. Almost all responders (partial response or better) required dose modifications. Most patients achieved a response before an extended (>2 cycles) dose delay; most who had not, subsequently achieved or deepened their response. In DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8, the median PFS in patients with ≥1 dose delay of ≥12 weeks was 36.6 months and not reached, respectively. Ocular events were common but effectively managed with dose modifications, allowing for patients to remain on treatment and derive robust efficacy benefit. The trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04246047 (DREAMM-7) and #NCT04484623 (DREAMM-8).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.