Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40763182›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Zebra optimization algorithm incorporating opposition-based learning and dynamic elite-pooling strategies and its applications.

Tengfei Ma, Guangda Lu, Zhuanping Qin, Tinghang Guo, Zheng Li, Changli Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tengfei MaSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China.
Guangda LuSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China.
Zhuanping QinSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2144-2958
Tinghang GuoSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China.
Zheng LiSchool of Automation and Electrical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China.
Changli ZhaoTianjin Sino-German University of Applied Sciences, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the limitations of the Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA), including insufficient late-stage optimization search capability, susceptibility to local optima, slow convergence, and inadequate exploration, this paper proposes an enhanced Zebra Optimization Algorithm integrating opposition-based learning and a dynamic elite-pooling strategy (OP-ZOA: Opposition-Based Learning Dynamic Elite-Pooling Zebra Optimization Algorithm). he proposed search algorithm employs a good point set-elite opposition-based learning mechanism to initialize the population, enhancing diversity and facilitating escape from local optima. Additionally, a real-time information synchronization mechanism is incorporated into the position update process, enabling the exchange of position and state information between the optimal individual (Xbest) and the vigilante agent (Xworse). This eliminates information silos, thereby improving global search capability and convergence speed. Furthermore, a dynamic elite-pooling strategy is introduced, incorporating three distinct fitness factors. The optimal individual's position is updated by randomly selecting from these factors, enhancing the algorithm's ability to attain the global optimum and increasing its overall robustness. During experimental evaluation, the efficiency of OP-ZOA was verified using the CEC2017 test functions, demonstrating superior performance compared to seven recently proposed meta-heuristic algorithms (Bloodsucking Leech Algorithm (BSLO), Parrot Optimization Algorithm (PO), Polar Lights Algorithm (PLO), Red-tailed Hawk Optimization Algorithm (RTH), Bitterling Fish Optimization Algorithm (BFO), Spider Wasp Optimization Algorithm (SWO) and Zebra Optimization Algorithm (ZOA)). Finally, OP-ZOA exhibits distinct advantages in optimizing the APF (artificial potential field) method to address local optimum convergence issues. Specifically, it achieves faster iteration speeds across four different environments, with the planned path length after escaping local optima being shortened by an average of 7.55175 m (16.291%) compared to other optimization algorithms. These results confirm OP-ZOA's enhanced optimization capability, significantly improving both escape efficiency from local optima and solution reliability.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsLearningHumans

Identifiers

PMID40763182
PMCPMC12324686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.