ArticlePloS one2025
Nationwide investigation of eukaryotic pathogens in ticks from cattle and sheep in Kyrgyzstan using metabarcoding.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Detection of Tick-Borne Parasitic Pathogens in Ticks Collected from Animal Hosts in Chuy Province, Kyrgyzstan.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ticks are significant vectors of bacterial, viral, and protozoan pathogens, impacting both public health and agriculture. In Kyrgyzstan, tick-borne diseases are a growing concern for livestock and human health. While bacterial and viral pathogens are widely studied, and limited previous investigations have focused on specific Babesia and Theileria species in certain host animals, comprehensive data on tick eukaryotic microbiota and potential pathogens across diverse hosts nationwide is scarce. To address this gap, our study provides the comprehensive nationwide assessment of the potential protozoan pathogens in ticks from cattle and sheep, analyzing data of Babesia and Theileria at the genus level. We collected 472 tick samples from cattle and sheep across seven regions of Kyrgyzstan (March-July 2022). Tick species were identified via microscope and Sanger sequencing (mitochondrial COI gene). Eukaryotic microbiota was analyzed using 18S rRNA V9 NGS. Sanger sequencing identified five genera and 11 tick species. NGS analysis revealed Babesia (13.3%) and Theileria (12.7%) as among the most prevalent protozoa detected at the genus level. Babesia was significantly more prevalent in nymph-stage ticks and those collected from sheep, whereas Theileria was detected across a broader range of tick species and host animals, showing less variation across life stages. No significant differences in prevalence were observed based on tick sex or the number of hosts in the tick life cycle. Regionally, Babesia detection was highest in the Osh region, particularly in ticks collected from both cattle and sheep. This is the first comprehensive nationwide analysis of tick eukaryotic metabarcoding study in Kyrgyzstan focusing on pathogenic protozoa detected at the genus level. Findings provide crucial baseline data on Babesia and Theileria geographic and host-specific prevalence. Understanding these information is essential for advancing future research and supporting the development of effective surveillance and control strategies against babesiosis and theileriosis in regional livestock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.