Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40763129›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A comparison of DNA methylation detection between HiFi sequencing and whole genome bisulfite sequencing in monozygotic twins with Down syndrome.

Kanyanee Promsawan, Chalurmpon Srichomthong, Monnat Pongpanich, Vorasuk Shotelersuk

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kanyanee PromsawanProgram in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Graduate School, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chalurmpon SrichomthongDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Center of Excellence for Medical Genomics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Monnat PongpanichDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3228-3351
Vorasuk ShotelersukDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Center of Excellence for Medical Genomics, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1856-0589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA methylation, a key epigenetic modification, regulates gene expression and diverse cellular functions. Bisulfite sequencing (BS) remains the gold standard for methylation detection, while PacBio HiFi sequencing enables direct detection without chemical conversion. Although both technologies are increasingly used, few studies have directly compared their concordance, particularly in clinically relevant settings such as Down syndrome (DS). We performed a comparative analysis of DNA methylation profiles using whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) and PacBio high-fidelity (HiFi) whole-genome sequencing (WGS) in a pair of monozygotic twins with DS. WGBS data were processed with two pipelines, wg-blimp and Bismark, while HiFi WGS data were analyzed using pb-CpG-tools. Our analysis focused on four key aspects: CpG site detection, genomic distribution of methylated CpGs (mCs), average methylation levels, and inter-platform concordance. HiFi WGS detected a greater number of mCs-particularly in repetitive elements and regions with low WGBS coverage-while WGBS reported higher average methylation levels than HiFi WGS. Both platforms exhibited methylation patterns consistent with known biological principles, such as low methylation in CpG islands, and the relative methylation patterns across genomic features were largely concordant. Pearson correlation coefficients indicated strong agreement between platforms (r ≈ 0.8), with higher concordance in GC-rich regions and at increased sequencing depths. Depth-matched comparisons and site-level down-sampling revealed that methylation concordance improves with increasing coverage, with stronger agreement observed beyond 20 × . Our findings support the reliability of HiFi WGS for methylation detection and highlight its advantages in regions that are challenging for bisulfite-based methods. This study demonstrates that HiFi WGS can serve as a robust alternative for genome-wide methylation profiling.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationDown SyndromeSequence Analysis, DNATwins, MonozygoticWhole Genome SequencingCpG IslandsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleSulfiteshydrogen sulfiteSulfites

Identifiers

PMID40763129
PMCPMC12324119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.