Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40763039›Full record

Observational studyActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Difference in pre- and postnatal prevalence of congenital cardiac tumors in a large population-based cohort.

Anne-Sophie Sillesen, Finn Stener Jørgensen, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Helle Zingenberg, Sofie Dannesbo, Anna Axelsson Raja, Ruth Ottilia Birgitta Vøgg, Niels Vejlstrup, Kasper Iversen, Henning Bundgaard

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02753348 (Copenhagen Baby Heart), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02753348 completednot on this map

Copenhagen Baby Heart

TypeobservationalSponsorHenning BundgaardRan2016 to 2018Enrolled25,000ConditionsCongenital Heart DiseaseArmsEchocardiography, Blood analysis from umbilical cord blood, ECG, Measurement of oxygen saturation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anne-Sophie SillesenDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7993-1016
Finn Stener JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Olav Bjørn PetersenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Helle ZingenbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sofie DannesboDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9997-1514
Anna Axelsson RajaDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ruth Ottilia Birgitta VøggDepartment of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels VejlstrupDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper IversenDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning BundgaardDepartment of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

BørnehjertefondenCandys FoundationHerlev-Gentofte Hospital Research FoundationHjerteforeningenNovo Nordisk FondenToyota Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac tumors in children are rare. Rhabdomyomas are the most common type in newborns, often associated with tuberous sclerosis. The exact prevalence of neonatal cardiac tumors is unknown. This study aimed to determine the pre- and postnatal prevalence of cardiac tumors in a population-based cohort. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis cross-sectional study collected data from two sources: (1) all fetuses who underwent routine prenatal malformation scans (Weeks 18-21) with expected delivery within the study period (April 2016 and October 2018), and (2) all newborns who underwent systematic transthoracic echocardiography in the population-based Copenhagen Baby Heart Study within the study period. Medical charts provided follow-up data. CLINICAL

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov; identifier: NCT02753348.

resultsAmong 47 228 live-births (51% male) in the study period, 1) 44 963 fetuses were scanned, with one prenatally diagnosed with a cardiac tumor (0.002% prevalence). Fetal autopsy revealed a cardiac rhabdomyoma. 2) Of 25 590 newborns (age 12 ± 8 days, 52% male) scanned, 7 had cardiac tumors (0.027% prevalence), a 14-fold higher prevalence than prenatally (p = 0.005). Tumors were located in the ventricles, predominantly (86%) multifocal, in otherwise normal hearts. Three affected newborns (43%) had tuberous sclerosis; the remaining four (57%) exhibited spontaneous tumor regression. Retrospective analysis of prenatal scans suspected a ventricular tumor in 1 of the 7 cases.

conclusionsIn a large, contemporary cohort, the pre- and postnatal prevalence of congenital cardiac tumors was 0.002% and 0.027%. This likely reflects the growth pattern of myocardial tumors and underscores the importance of gestational age for detection. Tumors in newborns were associated with tuberous sclerosis in 43%, and the remaining regressed spontaneously.

Indexed as

Heart NeoplasmsRhabdomyomaCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkEchocardiographyFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPrevalenceUltrasonography, Prenatalechocardiographyfetal ultrasoundnewbornsrhabdomyomasscreening

Identifiers

PMID40763039
PMCPMC12451209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.