ReviewBJU international2026
Direct in-scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions.
Review in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trends in kidney stone disease: a 5-year update of stone management in England and Scotland.BJU international · 2026Article
- Comparative performance of single-use flexible ureteroscopes with and without direct in-scope suction: a retrospective analysis.Journal of medicine and life · 2026Article
- Article
- Research progress on treating urinary system stones using ureteroscopy combined With a negative-pressure suction sheath.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo provide an overview of direct in-scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy, an emerging technology that integrates suction directly into the ureteroscope with the aim of enhancing stone clearance, improving visualisation, and reducing intrarenal pressure during ureteroscopic stone surgery.
methodsWe performed a narrative review of the current literature and incorporated insights from the authors' clinical experience using DISS ureteroscopy systems.
resultsDirect in-scope suction ureteroscopes are either single-channel or dual-channel. With single-channel ureteroscopes, irrigation must alternate with suction. A dual channel allows synchronous irrigation and suction. The suction can be applied continuously or intermittently (alternating with passive drainage). By actively managing intrarenal pressure, DISS may lower the risk of infectious complications and inadvertent laser injury. Unlike traditional ureteroscopy, some DISS systems may reduce the need for a ureteric access sheath (UAS). Early clinical data demonstrate that DISS offers stone-free rates comparable to standard ureteroscopy, with no increase in major complications. However, performance varies across devices, with trade-offs related to scope size, flexibility, suction power, and risk of clogging or collecting system collapse. Larger-calibre DISS ureteroscopes may face deflection limitations in tight calyces as well as the need for a UAS. Refinements in single-use platforms are addressing these challenges. DISS may be especially beneficial in patients with moderate-to-large stone burdens by enabling more efficient fragment evacuation and reducing the need for secondary procedures. Emerging technologies - such as integrated suction-laser tools and pressure-monitoring systems - promise to expand DISS capabilities further.
conclusionDirect in-scope suction ureteroscopy represents a significant evolution in endourological practice by addressing key limitations of standard ureteroscopy, namely, fragment management, intrarenal pressure control, and visualisation. There remains a need for high-quality level 1 evidence. With ongoing innovation, future DISS systems may offer complete stone clearance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.