Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40763000›Full record

ReviewBJU international2026

Direct in-scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy: techniques, outcomes and future directions.

Parth U Patel, Michael Uy, Casey Dauw, Wilson Sui, Jeffrey Plott, William W Roberts, Khurshid R Ghani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Parth U PatelDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2856-4567
Michael UyDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Casey DauwDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4123-0131
Wilson SuiDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jeffrey PlottDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
William W RobertsDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Khurshid R GhaniDepartment of Urology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6089-0733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide an overview of direct in-scope suction (DISS) ureteroscopy, an emerging technology that integrates suction directly into the ureteroscope with the aim of enhancing stone clearance, improving visualisation, and reducing intrarenal pressure during ureteroscopic stone surgery.

methodsWe performed a narrative review of the current literature and incorporated insights from the authors' clinical experience using DISS ureteroscopy systems.

resultsDirect in-scope suction ureteroscopes are either single-channel or dual-channel. With single-channel ureteroscopes, irrigation must alternate with suction. A dual channel allows synchronous irrigation and suction. The suction can be applied continuously or intermittently (alternating with passive drainage). By actively managing intrarenal pressure, DISS may lower the risk of infectious complications and inadvertent laser injury. Unlike traditional ureteroscopy, some DISS systems may reduce the need for a ureteric access sheath (UAS). Early clinical data demonstrate that DISS offers stone-free rates comparable to standard ureteroscopy, with no increase in major complications. However, performance varies across devices, with trade-offs related to scope size, flexibility, suction power, and risk of clogging or collecting system collapse. Larger-calibre DISS ureteroscopes may face deflection limitations in tight calyces as well as the need for a UAS. Refinements in single-use platforms are addressing these challenges. DISS may be especially beneficial in patients with moderate-to-large stone burdens by enabling more efficient fragment evacuation and reducing the need for secondary procedures. Emerging technologies - such as integrated suction-laser tools and pressure-monitoring systems - promise to expand DISS capabilities further.

conclusionDirect in-scope suction ureteroscopy represents a significant evolution in endourological practice by addressing key limitations of standard ureteroscopy, namely, fragment management, intrarenal pressure control, and visualisation. There remains a need for high-quality level 1 evidence. With ongoing innovation, future DISS systems may offer complete stone clearance.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUreteroscopesUreteroscopyEquipment DesignHumansSuctionTreatment Outcomedirect in‐scope suctionlaser lithotripsyretrograde intrarenal surgerystone‐free ratesuction ureteroscopyureteroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40763000
PMCPMC12950931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.