ArticleJCI insight2025
Efficacious genome editing in infant mice with glycogen storage disease type Ia.
Article in JCI insight, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA-LNP-mediated in vivo prime editing corrects disease phenotypes in a mouse model of citrullinemia type I.Science translational medicine · 2026Article
- Seeking stability for gene addition in inborn errors of metabolism.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSD Ia) is caused by a deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) in the liver leading to lethal hypoglycemia. Gene therapy with adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors encoding G6Pase fails to stably treat GSD Ia early in life. We evaluated genome editing in 12-day-old infant mice with GSD Ia using 2 AAV vectors, one containing Cas9 from Streptococcus pyogenes and a second Donor vector that expresses a guide RNA and a G6PC transgene. Gene therapy with the Donor vector only was compared with genome editing using both Donor and CRISPR vectors. Treatment with genome editing (total vector dose 0.2 × 1013 to 2 × 1013 vector genomes/kg) and bezafibrate (to stimulate autophagy) was efficacious, as assessed by hypoglycemia prevention and the frequency of transgene integration, which correlated with improved survival. This therapy achieved 5.9% chromosomal transgene integration through homology-directed repair, which surpassed a threshold to prevent long-term hepatic complications. No integration was detected in the absence of the CRISPR vector. Importantly for safety, CRISPR vector genomes were depleted, and no intact, integrated CRISPR genomes were detected by long-read sequencing. Thus, genome editing warrants further development as a potentially stable treatment for human infants with GSD Ia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.