ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2026
Characterizing spinal curves: addressing variability beyond identical cobb angles.
Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional methods for evaluating spinal curves, such as the Cobb angle, are limited in their ability to capture the full complexity of spinal deformities. This manuscript presents a novel method that builds on Cobb's principle and Ferguson's approach to provide a more comprehensive assessment of spinal curves. The method involves identifying the centroid-based endpoints of the curve to define its "radius of curvature" and calculating the true curve length through a three-point measurement, including the apical vertebra. The curve's type and sharpness are determined using ratios of distances derived from apical and adjacent lines, enabling detailed geometric characterization.This approach allows for precise analysis of complex deformities, such as continuous kyphotic curves in ankylosing spondylitis, and facilitates improved preoperative planning by aligning surgical strategies with the geometry of the curve. Additionally, it extends to evaluating bent rods in spinal instrumentation, ensuring accurate alignment. The method's ability to integrate multiple curve characteristics addresses critical limitations of existing techniques and holds potential for enhancing outcomes in both clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40762950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.