Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40762950›Full record

ArticleMusculoskeletal surgery2026

Characterizing spinal curves: addressing variability beyond identical cobb angles.

M Chehrassan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M ChehrassanBone and Joint reconstruction research center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran. morchehrasan@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional methods for evaluating spinal curves, such as the Cobb angle, are limited in their ability to capture the full complexity of spinal deformities. This manuscript presents a novel method that builds on Cobb's principle and Ferguson's approach to provide a more comprehensive assessment of spinal curves. The method involves identifying the centroid-based endpoints of the curve to define its "radius of curvature" and calculating the true curve length through a three-point measurement, including the apical vertebra. The curve's type and sharpness are determined using ratios of distances derived from apical and adjacent lines, enabling detailed geometric characterization.This approach allows for precise analysis of complex deformities, such as continuous kyphotic curves in ankylosing spondylitis, and facilitates improved preoperative planning by aligning surgical strategies with the geometry of the curve. Additionally, it extends to evaluating bent rods in spinal instrumentation, ensuring accurate alignment. The method's ability to integrate multiple curve characteristics addresses critical limitations of existing techniques and holds potential for enhancing outcomes in both clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

KyphosisScoliosisHumansSpondylitis, AnkylosingCurve characteristicsCurve measurementSpinal curveSpine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.