ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2025
Effectiveness and Safety of Long-Term Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal duration for thromboprophylaxis after colorectal cancer surgery remains uncertain. We sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of long-term thromboprophylaxis to that of short-term thromboprophylaxis in preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) after colorectal cancer surgery.
methodsIn our retrospective study, patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were divided into the short-term (< 7 days) and long-term (≥ 7 days) thromboprophylaxis groups based on the low molecular weight heparin prophylaxis regimen. Propensity score matching was performed for both groups, and comparative analysis of the incidence of asymptomatic or symptomatic VTE and bleeding complications was conducted. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed in the unmatched cohort to explore the association of potential risk factors with postoperative VTE.
resultsA total of 140 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery were included. After matching, there were 57 patients in each group. VTE occurred in 18 patients (15.8%) within 6 months after surgery, with 12 cases (21.1%) in the short-term thromboprophylaxis group and six cases (10.5%) in the long-term thromboprophylaxis group (P = 0.123). There were no significant differences in the incidence of bleeding complications between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis indicated that long-term thromboprophylaxis can reduce the risk of postoperative VTE (odds ratio 0.34, 95% confidence interval 0.12-0.95; P = 0.039).
conclusionsLong-term thromboprophylaxis (≥ 7 days) demonstrated comparable effectiveness and safety to shorter regimens (< 7 days) in preventing postoperative VTE in patients with colorectal cancer, while suggesting potential sustained protective benefits during extended follow-up periods exceeding 6 months. Whether VTE prophylaxis should be extended to 28 days post-surgery requires further research.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.